Saturday, June 02, 2007

FREE Workshop Healthy Places, People, Planet

Healthy People, Healthy Places, Healthy Planet:

Growth Management Strategies for Air and Climate Friendly Communities

Thursday, June 14, Everett 9:00 a.m. to Noon, Snohomish County Council Chambers

The land use choices local governments make not only affect where people live, the types of homes they live in, how far they travel, whether they drive alone or travel with others. These choices also impact public health, air quality and global climate.

The Puget Sound Clean Air Agency is your air quality planning and management resource for King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties and the cities within them.

Our clean air policies, adopted by the agency’s Board of Directors on February 22, 2007, are intended to promote public health, clean air and climate protection by focusing on six key action areas:

  1. Air and climate friendly development

  2. Cleaner travel

  3. Reducing exposure to air pollution

  4. Cleaner heating

  5. Environmental justice

  6. Using environmental laws for better public health and air quality

Come to one of our four workshops to learn more about our policies and how you can use them, and help us design implementation tools and resources that will meet your needs.

Green Building Program of the Year Award

Feature

Built GreenTM Receives NAHB Green Building Program of the Year Award!

NAHB AwardBuilt Green Director Aaron Adelstein was present at the NAHB National Green Building Conference in St. Louis, Missouri to receive the prestigious Green Building Program of the Year Award. This award was given to Built Green of King and Snohomish Counties for the incredibly successful year the program had in 2006. Other local winners included CMI Homes, Inc. which won the NAHB award for Green Home Marketing Project of the Year for the Built Green Showcase Home at Suncadia, and Mithun Inc. which won Multi-Family Project of the Year for the Built Green certified High Point community.

2006 was a banner year for Built Green of King and Snohomish Counties. We certified 3,107 homes in 2006, twice as many as were certified in 2005, and capped off the year by completing our ten-thousandth certified home since the inception of the program in 2000.

For more information on CMI Homes, Inc.'s Built Green showcase home, please see the Built Green case study here, or the project website.

For more information on Mithun and the High Point community, see the Built Green case study here, or go to the High Point website.

For a full list of the NAHB Green Building award winners please visit the NAHB website.

Communities Healthier and more Stable

Home Depot Launches $100M Development Plan

ATLANTA, May 30, 2007 -- The Home Depot's charitable, nonprofit foundation today announced a 10-year, $100 million plan aimed to make communities healthier and more stable. The funds, addressing two main areas, will help support the development of 100,000 affordable, healthy homes, and the planting and preservation of more than 3 million trees over the next decade.

"The Home Depot Foundation views houses as providing more than just shelter and thinks about trees as providing more than just shade," said Kelly Caffarelli, executive director of The Home Depot Foundation. "We believe in creating environments -- both inside a home and outside in a community -- that contribute to the financial stability, personal success, physical health and overall well-being of our neighbors."

One reason behind the foundation's push for affordable homes is the extreme shortage of such housing nationwide. The organization said that there demand for 5.3 million more affordable housing units than are available, and that more than 14 million families pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing, leaving little for their expenses.

A related crisis is the near-epidemic rates of asthma here, with more than 6.5 million children experiencing breathing problems associated with unhealthy indoor air quality, which can be significantly more polluted than outside air.

The Foundation touted their planned homes as being environmentally responsible, bringing reduced utility bills, better indoor air quality, lower maintenance expenses of durable materials and easy access to transportation, employment and recreational spaces.

Planting and preserving trees in urban and suburban areas is another way to improve human health and the environment. Trees can reduce energy use by cooling urban areas in the summer and providing shelter in the winter. The organization estimates that placing trees properly in a yard can reduce a home's energy usage by 30 percent.

Trees also provide natural infrastructure that controls stormwater runoff and erosion, reducing the need for cities to undertake expensive public works projects. Moreover, areas with adequate tree cover experience less crime, and residential property values increase by up to 20 percent. Over the past three decades, America has lost 30 percent of its urban forest, which is equal to the removal of more than 600 million trees.

"Whether we are helping a policeman afford to live in the city he protects or providing a healthy, safe place to play for hundreds of children in Minneapolis by planting 100 shade trees in their local park, our 10-year pledge is aimed at impacting people's lives in a positive, personal way," Caffarelli said. "The projects and organizations we support provide tangible benefits to individuals and families as they save on their monthly bills, have fewer visits to the doctor and enjoy a better quality of life."

Thursday, May 17, 2007

16 Cities Get Funding for Green Makerover





The Associated Press

NEW YORK — Sixteen cities around the world will get financing to "go green" by renovating buildings they own with technology designed to cut carbon emissions, former President Clinton announced Wednesday.

Clinton's foundation has created an arrangement among four energy-service companies and five global banking institutions that will result in major environmental upgrades in the cities, which include New York, Chicago, Houston, Toronto, Mexico City, London, Berlin, Tokyo and Rome.

"If all buildings were as efficient as they could be, we'd be saving an enormous amount of energy and significantly reducing carbon emissions," Clinton said.

The planned projects include replacing heating, cooling and lighting systems with energy-efficient networks; making roofs white or reflective to deflect more of the sun's heat; sealing windows and installing new models that let more light in and keep the elements out; and setting up sensors to control more efficient use of lights and air-conditioning.

Clinton said Citibank, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Chase, UBS and ABN Amro have each committed $1 billion to finance the upgrades.

Clinton announced the partnership as part of an international climate summit this week in New York. It is the second meeting of the C40 Large Cities Climate Summit, which was created so mayors and local governments could share strategies for reversing the trends of climate change.

Retrofitted buildings could see a 20 to 50 percent reduction in energy use, Clinton said.

Buildings are among a city's worst contributors to emissions totals, accounting for 50 percent of energy use in newer cities and more than 70 percent in older urban areas. In New York, for example, electricity, natural gas, fuel oil and steam consumed by buildings make up 79 percent of the city's total count of heat-trapping gases, a recent study found.

The other cities taking part in the building plan are Mumbai (also known as Bombay), India; Karachi, Pakistan; Seoul, South Korea; Bangkok, Thailand; Melbourne, Australia; São Paulo, Brazil; and Johannesburg, South Africa.

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Puget Sound Steelhead Get Federal Protection... How Does this Effect Development?

Oceangoing fish listed as 'threatened'
By CHRIS McGANNP-I REPORTER

They're sleek, muscular and bright as polished chrome, but the steelhead trout that still return to Puget Sound-area rivers are a dim reflection of the returns seen a just a decade ago.
On Monday, the federal government decided it is time for serious changes to prevent Puget Sound steelhead from disappearing altogether.

The National Marine Fisheries Service listed the fish as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act. The agency proposed the listing just over a year ago in response to a petition from Sam Wright of Olympia.

The "threatened" listing is not as severe as the agency's strongest protection, "endangered" but it still provides substantial protections for the fish, spokesman Brian Gorman said.
"In terms of their present condition, they were in perilous shape, but it also means that they are now afforded some very serious federal protections," he said. "Other federal agencies (now) need to come to us for permission to do anything that might affect these fish."

That combined with the state's $8 billion Puget Sound cleanup initiative bodes well for steelhead recovery, Gorman said.

Though conditions may change for the fish, which biologists say are in decline because of habitat degradation, dams and culverts, unfavorable ocean conditions and harmful hatchery practices, little -- including sport-fishing opportunities -- is likely to change for people around Puget Sound.

Many of the restrictions on shoreline development and land use are already in place because of existing chinook and chum salmon protections.

Heather Bartlett, spokeswoman for the state Department of Fish and Wildlife, said that the most rigorous restriction available is to require sport fishermen to release wild fish. That rule is already in effect on all Puget Sound-area rivers, she said.

Changes in hatchery practices eventually could affect fishing opportunities, but not in the immediate future, she said.

A species categorized as "endangered" is in danger of extinction. One listed as "threatened" is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future.

The listing covers naturally spawned steelhead from river basins near Puget Sound, Hood Canal and the eastern half of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. It also covers two winter-run hatchery stocks: the Green River natural and Hamma Hamma River.

The fisheries service considered the status of Puget Sound steelhead as recently as 1996, but said at that time the population did not warrant listing under the species-protection law.
Since then, agency biologists say there have been continued widespread declines in the fish's population, despite substantial reductions in the harvest of natural steelhead.
Advocates for fish lauded the listing.
The Wild Steelhead Coalition said the listing was an important step in protecting the region's depleted wild steelhead populations.
The group described the fish as an "extraordinary trout species (that) is born in Washington's rivers and streams, then migrates to the ocean, traveling as far as the Russia coast, to feed and grow to as large as 30 pounds before returning to their native Puget Sound-area rivers to spawn.

"Steelhead are the Washington State fish, and they have been an icon of the Pacific Northwest and a source of important cultural and economic benefits throughout the region's history."
Dick Burge of the coalition said: "Puget Sound's wild steelhead have been in steep decline for decades. In the past 20 years, we've seen formerly productive runs fail year after year. Decades of degraded habitat, poor hatchery practices and misguided harvest management have to be addressed to turn the declines around. It is time for action."

P-I reporter Chris McGann can be reached at 360-943-3990 or chrismcgann@seattlepi.com.

Friday, May 04, 2007

Daylighting Buildings Can Thaw Energy Bills

Author: Mark Anderson

Making use of natural light can save up to 75 percent of the energy used for lighting buildings and reduce cooling costs at the same time, but the ages-old practice has yet to gain wide acceptance across building professionals.

Daylighting continues to take the nation's building industry by storm. Federal and state tax breaks, along with a surge in high-performance building certification systems, fused a classic design element into the modern building industry.

Incentives offered through the Energy Policy Act of 2005 allow tax breaks of 60 cents per square foot for new commercial lighting that reduces power use 50 percent beyond 2001 standards. At the same time, a series of benchmarks issued by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) invite innovation based on performance standards for protecting the environment, which in many states, also gain tax credits. Further fueling the movement, a number of studies have repeatedly shown that daylit buildings save money and energy, create better working and learning environments, enhance well-being and coax retail shoppers into pulling out the plastic.

more of this article link to
http://www.greenerbuildings.com/news_detail.cfm?NewsID=35006

Thursday, May 03, 2007

What's New At the Beach?


Check out....
Boart Longyear uses sonic drilling equipment to drill the wells for the home's geothermal heating system
________________________________________________


In March of 2004, Dave and Anna Porter made a decision to reduce the impact their lifestyle was having on the planet. Among other changes, they sold their “McMansion” in Woodinville, with the enormous yard and Dave even made what many would consider the ultimate sacrifice: he gave up his Jaguar for a Toyota Prius.
In 2006, the Porters decided to go even further. They vowed to transform their ramshackle 100-year-old beachfront house into an energy-efficient, environmentally responsible home that would meet the strictest green home guidelines while providing a beautiful, comfortable living space that would meet their family’s current and future needs. To help others benefit from their experience, they committed to making the project a demonstration home for green design, systems, and materials, and to document their options, choices, and decisions as well as the performance of the home.
The result is “Going Green at the Beach,” a unique exploration of the possibilities open to all of us to make meaningful changes in how we live. Through this website, tours, presentations, and other education, the Porters will share much more than just the look of their “deep green” home when construction is complete in September of 2007. You’ll learn the opportunities and obstacles they faced, understand why they made the choices they did, see first-hand how a green home is built, and even hear tips on green living from the Porters’ “recycled” dog, Skipper.
We hope you enjoy "Going Green at the Beach"! Click here for a summary of the project!





Owners/ Developers:
Dave & Anna Porter
Builder:
Chaffey Homes
Architect:
GMS Architectural Group
Engineer:
DCI Engineers
Marketing/ Public Relations:
Green Dog Enterprises
Photography/ Website:
Northwest Property Imaging
Green Building:
Construction Consultants of WA
Interior Design:
Miller & Associates, LLC
Lender:
Countrywide Home Loans

Monday, April 30, 2007

The Business Case For Greening Your Facilities

As Fast as Possible!

By Jerry Yudelson
All over the country, facility managers and corporate real estate executives are making strong commitments to sustainability by acting right at home - greening their own facilities. Consider these examples.

In 2006, Adobe Systems, a software maker in San Jose, CA, achieved LEED-EB Platinum certification for all three buildings at its headquarters. At 1 million square feet of total office space, these three projects represent the largest such effort in the world to date. To demonstrate its commitment to environmental stewardship, an important public issue in Northern California beginning in 2001, Adobe decided to invest $1.1 million over 5 years to turn its three existing towers -ranging in age from 3 years to 10 years, and totaling almost 1 million square feet of space in offices and 940,000 square feet in garage space- into an environmentally friendly campus.

In that 5-year period, Adobe reduced electricity use by 35 percent, natural-gas use by 41 percent, building-water use by 22 percent, and irrigation-water use by 75 percent. Adobe now recycles 85 percent of its solid waste. Through saving energy and buying green power, Adobe reduced pollutant emissions by 26 percent. By the company's own reckoning, the projects they've undertaken have resulted in an overall 114-percent return on investment. Retrofit and upgrade projects include reduced lighting energy use, the addition of motion sensors to turn off lights and HVAC equipment when spaces are unoccupied, installation of variable-speed drives on pumps and fans to match supply to demand real-time metering to reduce electricity bills by avoiding power use during peak periods, upgraded building automation and control systems, and recommissioning of major energy-using systems. An early LEED-EB Platinum project was the California Environmental Protection Agency headquarters building in Sacramento, CA. Owned and

All over the country, facility managers and corporate real estateexecutives are making strong commitments to sustainability by actingright at home - greening their own facilities. Consider these examples...

In 2006, Adobe Systems, a software maker in San Jose, CA, achievedLEED-EB Platinum certification for all three buildings at itsheadquarters. At 1 million square feet of total office space, thesethree projects represent the largest such effort in the world to date.To demonstrate its commitment to environmental stewardship, an importantpublic issue in Northern California beginning in 2001, Adobe decided to invest $1.1 million over 5 years to turn its three existing towers -ranging in age from 3 years to 10 years, and totaling almost 1 millionsquare feet of space in offices and 940,000 square feet in garage space- into an environmentally friendly campus.In that 5-year period, Adobe reduced electricity use by 35 percent,natural-gas use by 41 percent, building-water use by 22 percent, andirrigation-water use by 75 percent. Adobe now recycles 85 percent of itssolid waste. Through saving energy and buying green power, Adobe reducedpollutant emissions by 26 percent. By the company's own reckoning, theprojects they've undertaken have resulted in an overall 114-percentreturn on investment. Retrofit and upgrade projects include reducedlighting energy use, the addition of motion sensors to turn off lightsand HVAC equipment when spaces are unoccupied, installation ofvariable-speed drives on pumps and fans to match supply to demandreal-time metering to reduce electricity bills by avoiding power useduring peak periods, upgraded building automation and control systems,and recommissioning of major energy-using systems.

An early LEED-EB Platinum project was the California EnvironmentalProtection Agency headquarters building in Sacramento, CA. Owned and 950,000-square-foot building completed its certification in 2003 with a series of projects that reduced energy use by 34 percent, diverted 200 tons per year of waste from landfills, and increased the building asset value by about $12 million. Total investment was about $500,000, with annual energy and water savings of $610,000. The building received an ENERGY STAR(r) rating of 96, in the top 4 percent of all energy-efficient operations in the country.

In 2006, the 6-story, 336,000-square-foot, state-owned Department of Education building, also in Sacramento, CA, received a LEED-EB Platinum designation. Completed in 2003, this building had earlier received a LEED-NC Gold certification as a newly constructed project. It is the first major project in the world to receive both designations at this high level. It has an ENERGY STAR rating of 95, with energy use about 40-percent less than required by state code. The building features more than 100 different sustainable solutions to improve energy efficiency, indoor air quality, water conservation, and resource conservation. The National Geographic Society operates a four-building headquarters complex in Washington, D.C., with buildings ranging in age from 20 to 100 years old. With a $6 million retrofit, the organization added $24million to the building's value, receiving a LEED-EB Silver designation in The JohnsonDiversey Corp. headquarters in Sturtevant, WI, was certified LEED-EB Gold in 2004.

The 3-story, 277,000-square-foot building contains 70-percent offices and 30-percent labs. Built in 1997 with sustainability in mind, it was fairly easy to fine-tune existing systems to receive the LEED-EB designation. With a $74,000 LEED-EB project cost, JohnsonDiversey saved about $90,000 in annual energy costs, reduced water use by more than 2 million gallons, and documented employee managed by Thomas Properties Group LLC, this 25-story,950,000-square-foot building completed its certification in 2003 with aseries of projects that reduced energy use by 34 percent, diverted 200tons per year of waste from landfills, and increased the building'sasset value by about $12 million. Total investment was about $500,000,with annual energy and water savings of $610,000. The building receivedan ENERGY STAR(r) rating of 96, in the top 4 percent of allenergy-efficient operations in the country.In 2006, the 6-story, 336,000-square-foot, state-owned Department ofEducation building, also in Sacramento, CA, received a LEED-EB Platinumdesignation. Completed in 2003, this building had earlier received aLEED-NC Gold certification as a newly constructed project. It is thefirst major project in the world to receive both designations at thishigh level. It has an ENERGY STAR rating of 95, with energy use about40-percent less than required by state code. The building features morethan 100 different sustainable solutions to improve energy efficiency,indoor air quality, water conservation, and resource conservation.The National Geographic Society operates a four-building headquarterscomplex in Washington, D.C., with buildings ranging in age from 20 to100 years old. With a $6 million retrofit, the organization added $24million to the building's value, receiving a LEED-EB Silver designationin 2003.

The JohnsonDiversey Corp. headquarters in Sturtevant, WI, was certifiedLEED-EB Gold in 2004. The 3-story, 277,000-square-foot building contains70-percent offices and 30-percent labs. Built in 1997 withsustainability in mind, it was fairly easy to fine-tune existing systemsto receive the LEED-EB designation. With a $74,000 LEED-EB project cost,JohnsonDiversey saved about $90,000 in annual energy costs, reducedwater use by more than 2 million gallons, and documented employee. One recent institutional commitment to LEED-EB deserves note: In December 2006, the University of California, Santa Barbara campus, agreed to use LEED-EB to assess 25 buildings over the next 5 years. Jon Cook, acting director of physical facilities, said, "We believe that performance under the LEED system is a key indication that we are achieving our goals" of taking care of the environment and of the health of employees and building occupants.

What's going on here? In all of these cases, facilities managers and executives have discovered the business-case benefits of "going green." In addition to saving energy (something which every organization is trying to do today, from Wal-Mart to your corner grocery store), these organizations are realizing savings on water use, chemical use, waste disposal, and other environmental measures.

Kimberly Clark Means Business

At Kimberly-Clark Corporation,Green means Business. Kimberly-Clark Filtration Media for HVACapplications helps commercial buildings achieve LEED credits and othergreen building milestones by improving indoor air quality, loweringenergy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, reducing waste, andmaking buildings healthier, more productive places to visit and work.For more information, visit http://www.kcfiltration.com/.

Saturday, April 28, 2007

Tiny Maltby

Tiny Maltby a hot destination for foodies, shoppers, gardeners

Special to The Seattle Times

THE SEATTLE TIMES

The Snoqualmie Gourmet Ice Cream Co. is endorsed by the Snohomish County Sustainability Task Force as being environmentally friendly, and is also endorsed by kids who make their own ice cream and pizzas at birthday parties there.


Visiting tiny Maltby, on the road between Woodinville and Monroe, I learned things I didn't know before, such as:

• Sustainability is not boring, especially when it supports the production of Jack Daniels-flavored ice cream. • A local cafe got its Swedish pancake recipe from the cook's grandmother.

• And the horse Zhivago shares his barn with a wild spirit.

Maltby's very existence was a learning experience for me, since I'd never heard of it before, although it seems everyone else has. Small enough to qualify as a neighborhood, it's become quite the destination for urbanites up and down the Interstate 5 corridor. So far, Maltby manages to retain its rural origins even as it welcomes a thoroughly modern and enlightened business — the Snoqualmie Gourmet Ice Cream Co.

Environmentally conscious

Officially endorsed by the Snohomish County Sustainability Task Force as an environmentally friendly development, the ice-cream parlor and production plant are housed in what looks like a big red barn. In fact, it once was a split-level rambler that owners Barry and Shahnaz Bettinger refurbished, thus eliminating the need to raze existing buildings and then dispose of debris. Right off the bat, a lesson learned: Want what you have.

Other innovations: They got rid of the water-sucking lawn and installed a rain garden that grows plants to flavor some of the ice cream. Heat generated from machines is recycled to warm buildings and water. The nubbly parking lot and walkways are pervious concrete, which lets water seep in rather than run off, and underneath lies 14 inches of crushed rock, allowing surface pollutants to percolate and degrade.

"Our mission is to make things as good as they can be," said Barry Bettinger. "It's our responsibility to our customers, employees and community."

And making life itself sustainable is the glorious, gourmet ice cream. The parlor, once a garage, serves up dozens of creamy flavors. One that's popular with those over 21 is spiked with Jack Daniels.

While the business sells products to many restaurants, grocery stores and cafes, the parlor is its beating heart. A 1950s-era fireplace remains and behind a plate glass window shines the stainless-steel kitchen. That's where kids have birthday parties, making their own ice cream and pizzas, the perfect venue, Bettinger said, because "they can make a mess in there."

There's also a drive-through window. "We thought it would be for espresso," said Bettinger, "but it's usually moms with kids in car seats coming in for ice cream."

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Critical Areas

New state law puts spotlight on late report of critical areas

Times Snohomish County Bureau

The Snohomish County Council is trying to figure out what a recently passed state law means in terms of how it protects critical areas at the local level.

The Legislature has imposed a three-year moratorium blocking any agency from passing ordinances related to agriculture, a subject Snohomish County has addressed in its pending critical-areas ordinances.

The county already is out of compliance for not having finished the environmental regulations that govern how to best protect sensitive areas, such as wetlands and riverbanks, as well as how to keep development out of dangerous areas such as fault zones.

Included throughout the documents, collectively called critical areas, are county rules pertaining to agriculture, and council members are unsure how removing them will impact protection of sensitive areas.

"We had ag provisions that pretty much had been agreed to by the ag community," said Councilman Dave Somers, who has headed the discussion as chairman of the County Council's planning committee. "There's been a move around the state to put some restrictions on ag activities to protect streams and wetlands, but now this new bill has been passed."

The county was supposed to finish the new critical areas ordinances by the end of 2005. Snohomish County and others couldn't finish on time, so the Legislature granted a one-year reprieve. Now it's nearly May 2007, and Snohomish County still isn't finished, meaning it loses out on certain planning and public-works grants at the state level.

"It's been mostly an issue in public works," said county planning director Craig Ladiser. "We lost one for the work at the airport, and my department was denied one also."

The state wants each county to update its planning rules by incorporating the best available science into the process. During the past 12 years — the last time the critical-areas rules were updated — science has changed the thinking on how some areas once thought unimportant for fish and wildlife habitat are now sensitive.

Most rules regarding river buffers and major wetlands are unchanged, but also needing protection are smaller feeder streams and 1-acre wetlands.

Developers say that's slightly unfair, as many of the small, unattached wetlands have been created as the result of other development throughout the county. Environmentalists argue that the county's proposals don't go far enough to maintain a balanced ecosystem as development continues to encroach.

The council will have the final say, with the understanding that whatever it chooses likely will wind up in court.

"There's the legality of it all," Ladiser said. "So we've worked to balance what we're doing."

New rules also force extra caution around danger areas such as earthquake fault lines and channel-migration zones.

Development along each will be given additional scrutiny in the future. River channels don't stand still, which means development too close to a river channel can be at risk, especially when rivers move during flooding.

The same holds for fault zones. While development won't always be prohibited, the county must be certain that its building standards will protect something in case of an earthquake.

"Basically, the critical-areas ordinances put into writing a lot of what we're already doing," Somers said. "Developers will still be able to build in the future."

Christopher Schwarzen: 425-783-0577 or cschwarzen@seattletimes.com

Mr Inslee..Congressional Record ... SDTF

"Sustainable design and green building practices are easy and available. An excellent example of how this can be done, and why green technologies help small businesses and the community, is the Snoqualmie Gourmet Ice Cream factory in Maltby, Wash. I recently toured this factory, which is Snohomish County's first sustainable commercial project, owned by Barry Bettinger. Barry used Small Business Administration (SBA) loans for low impact development strategies. With assistance from the Sustainable Development Task Force, he used technologies to cut his lighting costs by 50 percent, reduce his water usage by 40 percent and reduce energy for cooling fans by 75 percent."


Mr. INSLEE.


My fellow Members, we know that small businesses have been leaders in job creation and are the dynamic growth center for the American economy, and now they are poised to become the leaders in our green building revolution. We know that we have challenges on energy security, we know we have challenges to deal with on global warming, and we know that small businesses have challenges to receive capital to help in their programs to make their businesses more efficient, less costly for energy consumption, and less emitting of greenhouse gases.

Our amendment would create the ability of the SBA to provide capital to our small businesses across the country to do thousands of things that they want to start doing, items like putting additional energy-efficient equipment into their businesses, building green roofs that can prevent energy loss, installation of renewable energy sources like photovoltaic cells and energy equipment heating and cooling systems. The list is endless.

I would like to think of a little small business called the Snoqualmie Gourmet Ice Cream factory, which is some of the best ice cream in the world, but they used an SBA loan essentially to put pervious concrete and build a green roof, which helped their business operations and helped the environment to boot.

So we would propose that we expand the SBA purposes to allow our small businessmen and women to be on the cutting edge of green building and green businesses across the country. This will help them move a step forward to use their dynamic leadership.

 
[Page: H4113]  GPO's PDF
 

Mr. INSLEE. Mr. Chairman, I thank the Chairwoman and Ranking Member for their leadership on this issue. I rise today to support my amendment to the Small Business Lending Improvements Act (H.R. 1332) which would add an eligibility area to Section 504 loans. My amendment will ensure that American entrepreneurs

have the opportunity to start, build and, grow green small businesses by adding a sustainable design or low-impact design to the public policy goals of this lending program.

This common-sense amendment would decrease long-term operating costs for small business owners, stimulate green building technologies, create a better work environment for employees and reduce carbon emissions in the United States.

Buildings account for one-third of carbon emissions per year. It is important that we help small business owners make sustainable choices that they might not otherwise make due to cost, or simply due to the fact that some of these technologies are new. My amendment will help SBA expand their financing structure to help businesses use sustainable building standards, such as LEED certified, which have a minimal impact on our environment. Currently, SBA loans can help a company upgrade to required standards, but very few Small Business Loans have helped owners choose green building standards.

Furthermore, green buildings benefit workers. Case studies show examples of 2 to 16 percent increase in productivity in among employees who work in buildings that incorporate sustainable building design.

Sustainable design and green building practices are easy and available. An excellent example of how this can be done, and why green technologies help small businesses and the community, is the Snoqualmie Gourmet Ice Cream factory in Maltby, Wash. I recently toured this factory, which is Snohomish County's first sustainable commercial project, owned by Barry Bettinger. Barry used Small Business Administration (SBA) loans for low impact development strategies. With assistance from the Sustainable Development Task Force, he used technologies to cut his lighting costs by 50 percent, reduce his water usage by 40 percent and reduce energy for cooling fans by 75 percent.

I hope that the SBA and experts in sustainable design such as the National Institute of Building Sciences will work together to develop meaningful standards in this eligibility area of sustainable design.

Congress has a huge opportunity here to further improve the small business lending program to meet goals of reducing energy consumption in this country. Thank you for supporting this amendment.


Monday, April 23, 2007

Community Tours of the North Habitat Construction at Brightwater

Snohomish
Community Tours of the North Habitat Construction at Brightwater
The northern 43 acres of the Brightwater site on State Route 9 is being restored as an enhanced salmon habitat and reforestation area. This element of Brightwater mitigation is nearly complete after 8 months of construction. Visitors will be provided with a tour of the trails, and see native plant species, rebuilt stream corridors and emerging wetland habitat.
Sponsor Metro King County
Location Brightwater Treatment Site
Date Saturday April 28
Time Tour guides will escort groups at 9 a.m., 10 a.m., 11 a.m. and noon
Notes The tour takes a little over one hour and requires walking on unpaved paths. The habitat site is located within a construction site, so participants must sign liability waivers and wear appropriate clothing including sturdy, closed-toe shoes. Minors must be accompanied by an adult and the trails are not suitable for strollers. To arrange reasonable accomodation for people with disabilities, contact Rachael Dillman.
Contact Please sign up to take this tour with Rachael Dillman, rachael.dillman@metrokc.gov , 206-296-1311

Exploring Sustainable Pathways










A program sponsored by:

The Sustainable Living Institute

Presents .....The Next Industrial Revolution

A DVD Presentation (55 minutes)

Architect William McDonough and Chemist Dr. Michael Braungart bring a
compelling view of pioneering sustainability in the business sector by
redesigning buildings, processes, and products to work according to
nature’s rules.

Narrated by Susan Sarandon

Featuring:

William McDonough & Michael Braungart & The Birth of the Sustainable Economy
Thursday April 26th 2007 7:00pm

At the Mukilteo City Council Chambers

4480 Chennault Beach Road in Mukilteo

This Event Is Not Sponsored by the City of Mukilteo
For more information please call 425-265-9101 or zuma1@verizon.net

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Ten Things Wrong with Sprawl

Source: James M. McElfish, Jr.

In just the next thirty-four years, the Census Bureau tells us, we 300 million Americans will be joined by another 92 million. Where will all these people -- mostly us and our direct descendants -- live, work, play, worship, buy, sell, and serve? Where will 40 million additional households be located? What sort of built environment will we produce, and what will be the results for the nation's and the environment’s well-being?

The prevailing form of land development is popularly known as sprawl or exurban sprawl. Sprawl is characterized by low density development that rigorously separates residential uses from other land uses, and that relies entirely or almost entirely on automobile transportation to connect the separate uses. There are strong reasons to prefer that the nation’s future development does not reproduce this pattern -- reasons that have nothing to do with the price or availability of gasoline.

Economic critics of sprawl emphasize the high costs of duplicated infrastructure, the cost of time devoted to delays in commuting, and the distortions resulting from the mismatch between initial economic benefits of construction in sprawl areas and the costs of meeting subsequent demands for services (schools, roads, fire and police) by these same areas. On environmental grounds, opponents of sprawl decry the rising amount of land conversion per each unit of new development (more acres per person), the paving over of some of the nation’s highest quality farmland, and losses of biological diversity and open space.

Sprawl enthusiasts counter that people are getting what they want in low density housing and ubiquitous shopping, that a rising population will need more housing on cheap land, and that commute times, while rising, are not that bad for most people. They emphasize the number of construction jobs created and the higher assessed land value of developed lands over agricultural and forest lands.

In this report, James M. McElfish, Jr. of the Environmental Law Institute lists ten reasons that sprawl is bad for the country, its population, its economy and its environment. This clear enumeration of the problems posed by sprawl is intended to spur the adoption of more sustainable building and land-use practices. Download Now (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Recycling Drive Sends Computers to Those in Need

By CASEY MCNERTHNEYP-I REPORTER
Christine Henn spent all day Friday trying to get rid of her old TV. She went to Value Village, Goodwill, Thriftco -- but every place Henn tried to leave it, she was got the same answer.
Sorry. Too many metals and chemicals in that thing. Dispose of it elsewhere.

Paul Wagner heaves a mid-'90s Apple monitor into a bin during a daylong electronics recycling drive operated by EarthCorps and InterConnection at Magnuson Park on Sunday. Wagner works for InterConnection, a non-profit that provides refurbished computers to underserved communities locally and abroad. At left is Max Keeler, a 16-year-old volunteer from Seattle Academy.
After a day driving around, Henn still was stuck.
"It seems everyone has three TVs in their home," said the 40-year-old Seattle resident. "Now I know why I see them sitting on the street corners."
Her TV -- and hundreds of others -- might have ended up on a street corner had it not been for an annual recycling drive Sunday at Magnuson Park.
A pair of non-profits -- EarthCorps and InterConnection -- accepted computers, monitors, TVs and other electronics for a small fee, promising that the now obsolete gadgets wouldn't damage the environment.
They started at 9 a.m. Sunday, and by 2 p.m. old computers and electronics filled two-thirds of a semi-truck.
"And this is just one day," said EarthCorps Executive Director Steve Dubiel. "This is a simple way for people to help the Earth without working outside in the rain."
Many who left their old computers, such as Seattle resident Rob Kosin, didn't realize how much the used goods could help.

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

What If We Built Our Cities Around Places?

PPS's Great Cities Initiative proposes a place-based approach to revitalizing our towns, cities, and regions.

One of the joys for all of us working at PPS is learning from people all around the world about how they'd like to make their communities better. No two answers are the same, but listen long enough and the degree to which people share similar desires is remarkable. "Downtown would be a better place if I felt comfortable walking there," is a common sentiment. Or we'll often hear someone tell us, "There should be a place close to home where I can take my kids to play." Though the specifics vary, a steady current runs beneath the surface of what people say. It's the same desire for shared, public places that has shaped human settlements since the first cities were built.
Small steps to enliven streets, parks, and other public spaces are the building blocks of a thriving city.

The architect and author Christopher Alexander coined a phrase (and authored a book by the same name), "The Timeless Way of Building," that touches on these common yearnings and how people have intuitively used them to build congenial places to live. The process of building cities today has become so institutionalized, however, that people seldom have an outlet to put their intuition to use anymore. At PPS, we believe this timeless way of building can be reinvigorated, and we offer a common-sense way to do it: by empowering people to initiate improvements to their local neighborhoods place by place. These small steps to enliven streets, parks, and other public spaces are the building blocks of a thriving city.


Volunteerism is a sure sign that a neighborhood is heading in the right direction.

That is the idea at the heart of PPS's newly launched Great Cities Initiative (more on that below). The vitality of any city depends on citizen action such as neighborhood groups reclaiming their local parks and small businesses recharging commercial streets. Many times, communities need just a little nudge in the right direction to set this process of revitalization in motion. And in a short time, the entire neighborhood has undergone a turnaround as residents take comfort and pride in their public spaces.

What sort of "nudge" are we talking about? Imagine, for example, a neighborhood park bordered on one side by a commercial street and on another by a public library. These urban elements work together to form a single place, yet in a typical city that area would likely be managed by a number of public entities, each operating independently of the others. Instead of a unified approach to improving the place, we likely end up with atomized spheres of influence. The Department of Transportation promotes fast traffic on the roadway with little concern for pedestrians, park users, or patrons of local businesses. Park officials don't factor in library patrons or local shoppers when programming activities. You wind up with a park without popular activities, a street where people don't feel comfortable walking to the park or library, and local institutions cut off from the surrounding neighborhood.


Atomized spheres of influence: This street, bus stop, and library in San Antonio have no relation to each other except for a shared sense of emptiness.

But if we look upon these elements as interrelated components of a single place, we create more opportunities for local people to collaborate and jointly create a vision of what's best for the community. How can the street, park, library, and businesses support and strengthen each other? What do business owners, library employees, and nearby residents envision for the area? By simply observing and listening to the people who live or work or play in the area, the solution to what the place needs will become apparent.


This library in Riverside, California hosts concerts and markets, serving as a civic square for the city.


Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Green Home Economics






Photo: Eco-Home, Indie Budget

Green Guide 108 | May/June 2005

Eco-Home, Indie Budget
by Francesca Lyman
Filed under: Water heaters, Eco-Renovation, Green homes

The sun makes its way through the open slats of their back porch as Julie Grant and her fiancé, Mike Daugherty, lean against their all-purpose chop saw. When these urban homesteaders bought their 1904 one-story, 900-square-foot, wood-frame house a few months ago, they realized it needed a lot of work. But then, says Julie, with a wry smile, "All the houses we looked at that we could afford needed a lot of work."

Being a graphic artist and a jazz drummer by trade didn't stop them from plunging into a full-scale renovation of their late-Victorian bungalow in Seattle's Rainier Valley, a former lumber-mill town. And instead of a conventional Great American dream house in a new suburb, their more modest choice bought them $40,000 to invest in a remodel. The house was solid for its age, and its worst problems were add-ons, like the 1970s vintage electric baseboard heat, which, says Julie, was "hideously ugly and notoriously inefficient." After ripping out the baseboard, they corrected other funky features too—doorways that were never plumbed and partitions that broke up already smallish rooms. "The hallway into the kitchen was so wavy it looked like a funhouse," she says, laughing.

As if the task wasn't daunting enough, they wanted to make the house eco-friendly too. Unfortunately, Julie's copious research yielded little good advice from shelter magazines and home-supply stores. "All the stuff we found was so laughably out of our price range—and not by, like, a little stretch," says Julie. "I mean, they were all beautiful, but the gorgeous recycled glass cost $6 per four-inch tile!" Julie mentions one article in which a couple spent $30,000 on tile just to surface their bathroom. Such a move would have wiped out most of their budget. For their bathroom they plan to use a small amount of slate tile at $5 per square foot.

Nonetheless, Julie and Mike were determined to prove that they could make their high-minded ecological principles hew to an ultra-low budget—by choosing a small, efficient house close to a transit line, using a tankless water heater and gas heat and employing salvaged and recycled materials.

Strategic budgeting

Green building advocates admit that installing some green products, such as Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified wood from well-managed forests, can cost up to 10 percent more. The Environmental Home Center in Seattle has received so many questions about cost that it has responded with a green-budget brochure (see Resources).

But Derek Long, of Sustainable Connections in Bellingham, Washington, which promotes local green building, notes, "Very often you will find that a number of 'green' features for a home have a strong financial payback over time that makes them right for anyone with any budget." Long points to groups like Habitat for Humanity, which helps its low-income clients by installing efficient appliances and lighting and super-insulating homes that are usually smaller and demand fewer resources to begin with.

Savvy Salvaging

"Recycling is the key to eco-renovation on a budget," says Julie, who brags about the vintage back door that she found browsing through a salvage warehouse. "It's solid and came with real brass weather stripping that's expensive and difficult to find nowadays."

They saved hundreds of dollars by salvaging doors and windows from places like the Second Use store and thousands more by using the "sweat equity" of their own labor. "Then we hired a contractor for things we couldn't do, like reframing the attic, moving the back door and rewiring and plumbing," says Mike. For the kitchen, too, they scrounged from another remodel a Corian countertop and sink that were destined for the dump.

They discovered beautiful, wide-planked nineteenth-century fir flooring throughout the house that they could refurbish, instead of laying down new wood planks. Upstairs, they turned the unused attic into a sunlit master-bedroom suite, adding an old dormer window found on Craig's List and a skylight looking out on Mount Rainier.

Heating Choices

Downstairs, though, "It looks more like a bomb went off," says Julie, gazing at the hundreds of feet of polyethylene plastic tubing, uncoiled across the yard, the bowels of the new energy-efficient radiant-heat flooring they will soon install in the crawl space under their house.

Because the house lacked ductwork and a basement, they placed a wall-hung, tankless water heater, which warms water on demand, in the kitchen. In the crawl space beneath the first floor, they fit the tubes for a radiant-heating system that would save energy for the whole house. "Our house was small enough for one unit to do the job," says Julie of the water heater. The cost, including installation: less than $4,000.

Having already removed their electric heat, they switched to natural gas, which the city converted them to for free, making it even more cost-effective. Meanwhile, radiant-heat flooring below the house will offer them energy savings of up to 40 percent over a forced-air system, while being quieter, cleaner and more efficient.

Energy- and Water-Saving Appliances

A small, stackable ASKO washer-dryer came with an Energy Star rating that garnered Julie and Mike a $100 city rebate off the $2,300 price tag. That higher cost was offset by a gas range they got free through their county's waste-management hot line. A $700 Energy Star-rated Whirlpool fridge rounded out the kitchen. And the house came with a low-flush toilet.

Since the roof faces south with no big trees shading it, the couple says they are "definitely serious" about one day installing solar panels. "Probably we will start small—by getting outdoor solar lights," says Julie.

Framing, Trim Work and Walls

By opening up the attic for a third bedroom, the couple was able to turn a small bedroom downstairs into a music practice room for Mike's drum kit and another bedroom into Julie's studio space. Their second-floor attic remodel didn't require another heating unit because it was designed with a spiral staircase, which cuts through the middle of the house, venting heat upward.

Although they couldn't afford FSC-certified wood for framing and had to take what the local lumber yard provided, they did use eco-friendly trim in the form of medium-density fiberboard (MDF) with high recycled-wood content. They haven't done much painting yet, but Julie has purchased Rodda low-VOC paint for two rooms. To repair walls after removing partitions, they used drywall made of recycled materials.

Flooring

In the kitchen, Julie and Mike are installing no-adhesive, no-VOC cork flooring. For the attic remodel, they also bought Interface Flor carpet tiles made of recycled carpet. And they used low-VOC finish on their hardwood floors (see Resources).

The couple looks forward to their Housewarming Bash, at which Mike's jazz band will entertain out back. For now, though, they're knee-deep in the new cork flooring they just bought for their kitchen space—an expense they saved for by scrimping elsewhere. As for the housewarming, "It's perhaps a month away!" vows Julie, and after that the wedding.

—with additional reporting by P. W. McRandle








Monday, March 26, 2007

Rise and Cool and Sustainable Roofing

The Rise of Cool and Sustainable Roofing
Demand is growing for high-performance roof systems that meet standards for performance and longevity while also being energy efficient and sustainably constructed. Drew Ballensky lays out the details of next-generation roofs in Eco-Structure Magazine.

For nearly 10 years, the hottest trends in commercial roofing have been "cool" and "sustainable" roof systems. These concepts have been embraced by a growing number of industry associations and government agencies, and virtually every type of commercial roof system is under pressure to demonstrate it is energy efficient and environmentally friendly.

As cool and sustainable roofing continue to gain wide acceptance, they are driving significant change in the design and manufacture of roof systems, product innovation, marketing strategies, owner and manager selection priorities, and market dynamics. These trends, reinforced by a growing number of revised building codes and legislation, are creating demand for a new class of HPR, or high-performance roof, systems that can satisfy traditional performance criteria, including installed cost, performance and longevity, as well as newer criteria, such as preservation of the environment, energy efficiency and life-cycle costs.

more go to http://www.greenerbuildings.com/news_detail.cfm?NewsID=34603

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Zero-Energy Homes in Issaquah

"Zero-energy" homes planned in Issaquah
By Sonia Krishnan

Your future home could come from the recycling bin.
Solar energy would power it.

The best part? Utility bills would be next to nothing.

They're called "zero-energy" homes — homes designed to produce as much electricity as they consume. And in Issaquah, city officials are planning an unusual partnership with a builder to construct King County's first community by 2009.

"This would be the first step in a new paradigm for green development," said Brad Liljequist, sustainable-building and lead urban-design consultant for the Issaquah project.
The 10 energy-saving town houses in the Issaquah Highlands will be aimed at the median market.

"We don't want this to be for an exclusive few," he said.

How the homes work
A "zero-energy" home is designed to produce as much energy as it consumes. The diagram shown here (PDF) of such a home shows how its features help reduce energy consumption and cost. While the ultimate goal is to get to zero, most homes end up slashing utility bills 50 to 70 percent.

The city's efforts follow in the path of a U.S. Department of Energy program pushing zero-energy home construction. "Building America" began in 1995, with a goal to trim household energy use by 70 percent by 2020.

About 2,000 zero-energy homes have been built around the country since 2003, said Tim Merrigan, senior program manager for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colo.

Federal and state tax credits, coupled with financial incentives from utility companies, are driving the trend forward, builders say.

While the ultimate goal is to get to zero, most homes end up slashing utility bills 50 percent to 70 percent, Merrigan said.

That's enough to draw increasing numbers of buyers in fast-growing states such as Arizona and California, where residents face some of the nation's highest energy costs. In Washington state, another zero-energy community is planned for Lopez Island, San Juan County.

The timing seems ripe.

In November, the environmental catchphrase "carbon neutral" was selected as The New Oxford American Dictionary's "Word of the Year." Three months later, a team of international climate scientists declared humans to blame for global warming. And late last month, former Vice President Al Gore's documentary on global warming, "An Inconvenient Truth," won an Oscar.
"You could say it's reached a tipping point," Merrigan said.

Residential buildings in America contributed 21 percent of the country's carbon-dioxide emissions to the environment in 2005, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Inefficient heating and cooling systems, poor insulation and energy-sucking appliances, such as outdated refrigerators, are mostly to blame for high fuel consumption.

Then there's the "standby factor."

Keeping appliances such as stereos, computers and televisions plugged in all day consumes between 500 and 1,000 kilowatt-hours a year per household, said Alan Meier, scientist for Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, who has written on the phenomenon.
That's comparable to about one month of power consumption, he said, and equals at least 700 pounds in carbon-dioxide emissions.

"Standby power is one of the biggest obstacles to achieving a zero-energy home," Meier said.
In Issaquah, staff members say they're undeterred by the challenges. The City Council recently approved $50,000 to study the project. Over the next two years, the city plans to collaborate with a builder and develop the project's design and energy-efficient standards. It will run an educational program for homebuilders and homeowners once the project is built.

The town homes would sit on a half-acre on Northeast High Street in the Issaquah Highlands. The proposed site was donated by Port Blakely Communities, developer of the Highlands, to use as a demonstration tool for future homebuilding, said Judd Kirk, president of Port Blakely.

According to preliminary plans, the homes will range from 500 to 1,700 square feet. The project would:


  • • Reduce water use by 50 percent over the average household by installing low-flush toilets that use stormwater collected from rooftops and filtered in a nearby tank. This reclaimed water would not be used for drinking or showering.
    • Produce no stormwater discharge through green roofs and permeable pavement.
    • Use a "very high percentage" of locally sourced or recycled materials.
    • Use highly durable materials, such as metal roofing instead of asphalt shingles and hardwood floors instead of carpeting.


Issaquah is ahead of most cities when it comes to building "green," environmental advocates say. In 2004, for instance, the city hosted tours and seminars on the Built Green Idea Home — a model home in the Highlands — to inspire people about eco-friendly choices.


"We're trying to be responsive to climate change," said David Fujimoto, manager of Issaquah's resource-conservation office. "Our goal is to really push the envelope and encourage new construction to achieve the highest level of environmental performance possible."


Recycled materials play a big role in zero-energy homes. Lumber planks made from wood and plastic bottles are used for decks, doors or window frames. And fibers taken from recycled newspapers are turned into insulation.


Using the latest technology, zero-energy homes are fitted with rooftop solar panels that convert the sun's rays into electricity.


During the Northwest's long summer days, the homes would send extra kilowatts back to the local utility grid. In the dark winter months, the homes would draw on that power. At the end of the year, the home's net energy use should, theoretically, equal zero.


Most zero-energy homes also come with tankless water heaters, energy-efficient appliances, heavy insulation and improved air-conditioning and heating systems.


The intricate systems help keep indoor temperatures stable, said Chuck Murray, energy specialist for Washington State University and a consultant for Issaquah's project.
If homeowners produce more electricity than they use, utility companies are required to credit them for it under Washington's net-metering law. And, under a state law that took effect last year, those who generate solar energy for the power grid could earn up to $2,000 a year in cash reimbursements through —.


Zero-energy homebuilders say they're seeing more demand as fuel prices rise.
"When we started doing this four years ago, gas was $1.50 a gallon. Energy efficiency was not in the top five things homeowners were looking for," said John Ralston, vice president of sales and marketing for Premier Homes in Roseville, Calif., near Sacramento.


But sales have taken off so well that an all-solar development is under way in Yuba City, Ralston said. State-of-the-art-efficiency doesn't come cheap.


The features could tack about $100,000 on to the Issaquah units, Liljequist said. Rebates and tax credits would help offset that, he said. And strides in technology have made solar panels cheaper and easier to work with than in years past.


But most of all, he said, shrinking square footage will keep costs in line.
"Rather than having that extra-large bonus room, we want to put that money towards living more lightly on the earth," he said.


Sonia Krishnan: 206-515-5546 or skrishnan@seattletimes.com
Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

Quinns Crossing Steet of Dreams

Tomorrow at 9:00 a.m. in the County Council chambers will be the final plat hearing for Quinn's Crossing Street of Dreams development.
see my letter in the Herald.

The county planners are allowing the drainfields to be put in the buffers around the sole source aquifer that supplies these rural folks their drinking water. It is against the county code, but for some reason, they feel it is okay because the "spirit of avoidance" has occurred! If the council approves this, it will set a precedent for other developments that may want to put drainfields into the buffers for our wetlands and streams.



Please email the county council and the clerk of the council tonight or by early tomorrow and request they deny this final plat approval until this is fixed. Also email Aaron Reardon and Craig Ladiser as well. Emails below. Thanks!!



Dave.gossett@co.snohomish.wa.us

Dave.somers@co.snohomish.wa.us

Kirke.sievers@co.snohomish.wa.us

John.koster@co.snohomish.wa.us

Gary.nelson@co.snohomish.wa.us

Council.clerk@co.snohomish.wa.us

Craig.ladiser@co.snohomish.wa.us

Aaron.reardon@co.snohomish.wa.us


Sunday, March 11, 2007

Low Impact Development in the Highway Runoff Manual


Washington State Department of Transportation


Workers install Eco-Stone® permeable pavers
Select photo to view in larger scale
Workers install Eco-Stone® permeable pavers at a municipal park and ride in Marysville. The Washington State Department of Transportation is considering using permeable pavement, such as Eco-Stone®, at its park and rides and on pedestrian paths.

Eco-Stone® permeable pavers
Select photo to view in larger scale
Eco-stone detail

Description
The Washington State Department of Transportation is currently revising its 1995 Highway Runoff Manual. As part of this revision, the department will develop and reference three low impact development elements in the revised manual:

1. Permeable paving at park and rides, pedestrian paths, and lower speed roadways.

2. Bioretention along roadways.

3. Constructed wetlands for stormwater treatment.

The LID portion of the revised manual should be available for use by the end of September 2003 and will include plans, specifications, methodology for estimating costs, and a hydraulic design process.

Contacts
Rick Johnson

Washington State Department of Transportation
(260) 440-4642
johnsor@wsdot.wa.gov

Larry Schaffner
Washington State Department of Transportation
(360) 570-6657
schaffl@wsdot.wa.gov
Website:
www.wsdot.wa.gov/fasc/
Follow the links to:

>Engineering Publications
>On-Line Technical Manual Library
>Highway Runoff Manua

Going Green At the Beach




In March of 2004, Dave and Anna Porter made a decision to reduce the impact their lifestyle was having on the planet. Among other changes, they sold their “McMansion” in Woodinville, with the enormous yard and Dave even made what many would consider the ultimate sacrifice: he gave up his Jaguar for a Toyota Prius.

In 2006, the Porters decided to go even further. They vowed to transform their ramshackle 100-year-old beachfront house into an energy-efficient, environmentally responsible home that would meet the strictest green home guidelines while providing a beautiful, comfortable living space that would meet their family’s current and future needs. To help others benefit from their experience, they committed to making the project a demonstration home for green design, systems, and materials, and to document their options, choices, and decisions as well as the performance of the home.

The result is “Going Green at the Beach,” a unique exploration of the possibilities open to all of us to make meaningful changes in how we live. Through this website, tours, presentations, and other education, the Porters will share much more than just the look of their “deep green” home when construction is complete in September of 2007. You’ll learn the opportunities and obstacles they faced, understand why they made the choices they did, see first-hand how a green home is built, and even hear tips on green living from the Porters’ “recycled” dog, Skipper.

We hope you enjoy "Going Green at the Beach"! Click here for a summary of the project!

http://www.goinggreenatthebeach.com/

Buckminster Fuller Institute (BFI)







The Buckminster Fuller Institute (BFI) serves as a catalyst for the design and implementation of breakthrough strategies for achieving a sustainable future.

We fulfill our mission by offering innovative programs that:
  • Utilize BFI's Information Clearinghouse on the pioneering legacy of R. Buckminster Fuller.
  • Provide a global perspective on the most pressing issues facing humanity.
  • Engage leading thinkers and designers who are demonstrating whole systems solutions to complex problems.
  • Provide the opportunity to design and test those solutions in the real world.

http://www.bfi.org/

Monday, March 05, 2007

Built Green Site Tour Snohomish County

Wednesday, March 14, 2007 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

Built Green Site Tour of Cottage Werks 10th Street Short Plat in Snohomish County.

This tour will focus on the Low Impact Development strategies incorporated in to the community as well as a detailed walk through of one of the homes built by Cottage Werks and certified Built Green.

Tour presenters will include Chris Chase of Cottage Werks, as well as consultants Dan Wildenhaus of Atmosphere and Alistair Jackson of O’Brien & Company.

The cost for the tour is $50/person, with lunch and transportation to the sites provided. The tour is limited to 75 attendees so sign up today! To register download the conference registration form and mail or fax 425-646-5985.